<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crackpot Ideas &#187; Servers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.crackpotideas.com/category/servers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.crackpotideas.com</link>
	<description>Enterprise IT, Technology, and other Random Musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>VMWare HA is not Oracle RAC</title>
		<link>http://blog.crackpotideas.com/2009/05/vmware-ha-is-not-oracle-rac/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.crackpotideas.com/2009/05/vmware-ha-is-not-oracle-rac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mzito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crackpotideas.com/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This originally started out as a much longer rant about EMC/VMWare vs. Oracle in general, but WordPress managed to eat the draft, and there&#8217;s no way I&#8217;m going to rewrite the whole thing, so I&#8217;m going to instead write a series of blog posts, each one covering a point in EMC&#8217;s recent salvo against Oracle [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.crackpotideas.com/2009/05/vmware-ha-is-not-oracle-rac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualized Hardware Faster than the Real Deal?</title>
		<link>http://blog.crackpotideas.com/2009/02/virtualized-hardware-faster-than-the-real-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.crackpotideas.com/2009/02/virtualized-hardware-faster-than-the-real-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mzito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crackpotideas.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Timothy Prickett Morgan over at The Register has penned an article entitled, &#8220;Fake server beats real server in web test&#8221;.  The gist of the article is that VMWare has released results showing that virtual Linux servers running on VMWare&#8217;s ESX hypervisor have garnered the highest single-server performance for a 16-core machine, and significantly beat out [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.crackpotideas.com/2009/02/virtualized-hardware-faster-than-the-real-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Gets Into the Hardware Biz</title>
		<link>http://blog.crackpotideas.com/2009/01/cisco-gets-into-the-hardware-biz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.crackpotideas.com/2009/01/cisco-gets-into-the-hardware-biz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mzito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crackpotideas.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone and their mother has been writing about this, but yes, Cisco is entering the server business.  Details are still skimpy, but it looks like it&#8217;s a blade server, it&#8217;s got VMWare baked in, and the word &#8220;virtualization&#8221; gets thrown around every three sentences or so.  I&#8217;ve been talking to some people who don&#8217;t understand [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.crackpotideas.com/2009/01/cisco-gets-into-the-hardware-biz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
